However, we did not observe any synergistic effects. The repeatedly observed failure to produce synergistic effects upon combining siRNAs has been suspected to be attributable to the competition between siRNAs for RISC loading (Castanotto et al., 2007, Formstecher et al., 2006 and Koller et al., 2006). It is possible that some of the siRNAs employed in the present study were more efficiently incorporated into
the RISC, and were therefore able to outcompete the others. Animal studies will eventually reveal how efficiently the siRNAs selected in this study can inhibit adenovirus multiplication in vivo. Delivery of siRNAs into living organisms is much more challenging than delivery into cells in vitro. However, a number of delivery vehicles have been developed over the past years which have continuously improved GSI-IX the delivery rates in vivo ( Rettig and Behlke, 2011), and RNAi has successfully been applied to condemn virus replication in vivo ( Arbuthnot,
2010, Haasnoot et al., 2007 and Zhou and Rossi, 2011). The results reported here may also help to generate viral vectors for the efficient AZD5363 clinical trial expression and delivery of anti-adenoviral siRNAs in the form of shRNAs or artificial miRNAs, a potential alternative way of eliciting anti-adenoviral RNAi in infected cells. Taken together, our data indicate that: (i) highly potent siRNAs are able to inhibit adenovirus multiplication, making them attractive anti-adenoviral drug candidates; (ii) silencing of early adenoviral genes may be more beneficial
than silencing of late genes; (iii) silencing of certain early genes can indirectly reduce late gene products more efficiently, or at least as well as, direct silencing of the late genes; (iv) adenoviral infections may be more effectively treated by reduction of adenoviral DNA than by reduction of the proteinaceous components of the virion; (v) the adenoviral DNA replication machinery, and in particular the DNA polymerase gene, constitutes a key target ASK1 for RNAi-mediated inhibition of adenovirus multiplication; and (vi) silencing of the E1A gene (although less effective than silencing of the DNA polymerase gene in preventing the generation of virus progeny) should not be excluded as a potential strategy, because it may impair virus spread in vivo, by prolonging the survival of infected cells. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund through Grant L665-B13. “
“The authors regret that in the original publishing of this article, the second author was omitted from the author list. The corrected authors list appears as above. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused. “
“Approximately 2.5–3.5 billion of the world’s population is at risk of contracting dengue (TDR, 2009 and WHO, 2012a).