Based on the positive findings of this trial, future research should attempt to elucidate the relative benefit of individual components of this
type of program. “
“The 10-metre shuttle run test is an adapted version of the 20-metre shuttle run test to accommodate children with cerebral palsy (CP) classified at Level I or Level II on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) (Verschuren et al 2006). Separate protocols were designed for each level (SRT-1 and SRT-2). The course is 10 metres long; the end is marked with 2 cones and measuring tape. Subjects should wear regular sports clothing and shoes, and orthoses, if applicable. Each child should also wear a heart rate monitor. Children walk or run between the 2 markers at a set incremental speed. These runs are synchronised with a pre-recorded CD, which plays beeps at set intervals. As the test proceeds, the interval Ixazomib price between each Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor successive beep reduces, forcing the child to increase speed over the course of the test, until it is impossible to keep in sync with the recording. There are 2 protocols available for the shuttle run test. The Level I shuttle run test (SRT-I) is for children classified at
GMFCS Level 1 (ie, able to walk indoors and outdoors without restrictions). The SRT-I starts at 5 km/h. The Level II shuttle run test (SRT-II) is for children classified at GMFCS Level 2 (ie, able to walk indoors and outdoors with restrictions). The SRT-II starts at 2 km/h. Speed is increased 0.25 km/h every level (minute) for both tests. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change: The test-retest reliability for exercise time (ICC coefficients of 0.97 for the SRT-I and 0.99 for the SRT-II) and reliability for peak heart rate attained during the final level (ICC coefficients of 0.87 for the SRT-I and 0.94 for the SRT-II) are good. High correlations were found for the relationship between data L-NAME HCl for
both shuttle run tests and data for the treadmill test (both r = 0.96). The test has also been shown to be sensitive to change in children with CP ( Verschuren et al 2007). Change in a child’s performance of more than 0.84 minute (one level) for the SRT-I and of more than 0.50 minute (half level) for SRT-II can be attributed to real change with 95% confidence. Field tests of aerobic capacity can provide valid, reliable outcome measurements without the burden of expensive equipment in a sophisticated laboratory setting. Although they were developed almost 30 years ago, shuttle run tests are the most widely used field tests to estimate aerobic capacity (Leger and Lambert 1982). For children who are able to walk independently, the most functional way to assess their aerobic capacity would be a walking- or running-based exercise test. The treadmill protocols that are often used in clinical practice are not appropriate for children with CP.