, 1996). Even where both sexes appear to be supported by their same-sex peers, male and female rats exhibit anxiety responses and adrenal reactions under different combinations of conditions (Westenbroek et al., 2005). Some of these differences may
relate to neurochemical variation in the brains of males and females. Both oxytocin and vasopressin are important for social behavior, and there are sex differences in the production and release of these neuropeptides, the location and density of their receptors, and their roles in social behavior (Bales and Carter, 2003 and Carter, 2007). There are many sex differences in human psychiatric disorders, most notably anxiety and depression, which some argue are based on sex differences in responses to stress (Bangasser and Valentino, 2014). One SCR7 chemical structure consequence of these findings is that we must study the interactions of stress and social behavior in both sexes in order to make meaningful conclusions about each sex. This idea is gaining greater appreciation within the scientific and funding communities (Mogil and Chanda, 2005, Cahill, 2006, Zucker and Beery, 2010, Couzin-Frankel, 2014, Clayton and Collins, 2014 and Woodruff et al., 2014). The social environment can cause
stress or ameliorate the impacts of stress, and social behavior responds to stress. These effects may happen all together or at different times, and vary with individual genetic background, experience, sex, species, and other check details factors. While it is not feasible to study all such factors in a single study, almost a century of research has helped to show which stressors are most impactful in males and females, and how such stress is reflected in neurochemistry. Interaction time is a longstanding measure of social behavior, but recent studies have begun to employ more enough nuanced approaches – for instance measuring helping behavior and distinguishing preferences for familiar versus unfamiliar individuals. While adverse
social conditions (from subordination to isolation) are potent stressors, the interactions between stress and social behavior also offer multiple entry points into the study of stress resilience. Stress resilience varies with early life social environment—in particular with experience of maternal behavior and life history of exposure to mildly stressful experiences. Resilience can also arise from the mitigating or buffering effects of positive (or negative) social interactions. There is a vast body of literature linking stress and social behavior and their roles in resilience. We may learn the most from these studies when we consider the social life of the organism, and look beyond group averages to individual variability. We are grateful to Dr. Julio Ozores for engaging discussions on this topic, and to Drs.