While there was less fat consumed during the high FODMAP diet by both healthy and IBS subjects, it is unlikely that this would have contributed to the observed increase in gas or symptoms. Indeed, higher (not lower) fat intake has been associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders22 and with impaired gas clearance and induction of symptoms.10 The HFD (low fat, high FODMAP) was associated with considerably greater gas production than that associated with the LFD (higher fat, low FODMAP), and the gas

Ganetespib price was produced over the entire 14-h period of observation. Subjects with IBS produced more hydrogen gas than healthy controls during both the low and high FODMAP dietary periods. Breath hydrogen output was fourfold greater during the HFD. Paradoxically, methane output did not increase during the HFD, despite greater hydrogen production. Indeed, its output significantly fell in the healthy volunteers. These observations imply that hydrogen produced MK-8669 concentration with a high FODMAP load will occupy a relatively greater space than that produced when the FODMAP load is low, since four liters of hydrogen are used to produce one liter of methane.23 Conversely, reducing FODMAP intake is associated

with a relative shift towards methane production in healthy subjects and therefore lower luminal gas volumes in those with methanogenic bacteria. Mechanisms underlying this ‘switch’ away from methane production in association with a high luminal FODMAP load in healthy volunteers 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 have

not been defined. This change in methane production in healthy controls may be as a result of change in the functional capabilities of the methanogenic organisms. For example, there is some evidence that under more acidic conditions, the activity of some methanogens, such as Clostridia,24 is reduced. A high FODMAP load will lead to greater production of short-chain fatty acids and subsequent acidification of the lumen may then inhibit methanogenic activity. Also, any osmotic effect associated with the HFD12 could result in faster transit through the colon, which may inhibit methanogenesis, since purging can reduce methane production.25 Why this switch was not observed in some patients with IBS also requires examination. It presumably relates to the balance or dysbiosis of the colonic microbiota compared with the eubiosis in healthy subjects. There is some evidence for differences in the spectrum of bacteria and their functional capabilities in patients with IBS.26 Also, in patients with IBS, bacteria (including methanogens), tend to be located more diffusely along the gastrointestinal tract (i.e. small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, SIBO).27 The lack of switch away from methanogenesis in the presence of luminal FODMAPs might be another reflection of such functional and locational abnormalities in colonic microbiota associated with IBS.