We found 434 genes that changed expression between 0.5 and 4

hours after surgery (Supporting Table 2) and 3807 genes that changed expression between 24 and 48 hours after PH versus time zero (Supporting Table 3). In agreement with previous observations from more limited expression analyses,23, 24 our microarray analysis of livers 0.5 and 4 hours post-PH showed a significant increase in the expression of early response genes, such as CCAAT/enhancer binding protein Neratinib beta, Jun oncogene, myelocytomatosis oncogene, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A, hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha, activating transcription factor 3, and v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2 (Supporting Table 2). Several responsive genes, not previously reported to be regulated in the context of liver regeneration, included pluripotency regulator Kruppel-like factor 4, transcription factors MAX interacting protein 1 and SIN3 homolog A transcription regulator, and antiapoptotic B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2) family member Bcl2l1 (Supporting Table 2). Functional annotations of genes that changed expression

in response to PH at 0.5 to 4 hours included categories also identified for TA-p73–bound genes (Fig. 1B and Supporting Figs. 1B and 2B). Similar to TA-p73–bound genes in the quiescent liver, genes that changed Atezolizumab datasheet expression (either increasing or decreasing) during 24 to 48 hours of liver regeneration were associated with cancer, cell death, and cell proliferation (Fig. 1C). Cell signaling and inflammatory response, represented among TA-p73–bound genes, had a hit rate of less than 1% among genes that changed expression in the 24 to 48 hours after PH, and this suggests unique functions for TA-p73 in the liver that are not executed during the 24 to 48 hours of regeneration. In comparison with earlier time points, genes that changed expression in the regenerating liver 24 to 48 hours post-PH had a significant increase in targets within the cell cycle and DNA replication categories (Fig. 1C and Supporting Figs. 1C and 2C). A direct comparison

of gene IDs from a microarray analysis of genes with altered expression medchemexpress 24 to 48 hours post-PH to TA-p73–bound genes yielded 17 TA-p73–bound genes up-regulated or down-regulated in response to PH. This list included a group of transcription factors (cyclin D binding myb-like transcription factor 1; Foxo3; and nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 3) as well as cell cycle regulators and plasma membrane receptors (Supporting Table 4). We hypothesized that the select group of TA-p73–bound genes, which displays altered expression during liver regeneration, may offer further clues regarding liver-specific gene targets of both p53 and TA-p73. TA-p73 can bind to the same consensus site, simultaneously with p53, at the p53RE of hepatic gene Afp.