Vietnam relies heavily Birinapant on imported raw material for processing. It is suspected that about 25% of the tuna caught by Vietnamese vessels originates from Indonesia׳s EEZ, illegally caught with no fishing agreement [88]. (Another 5–6% of unregulated catch comes from disputed waters of the

Spratly Islands, claimed by China, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and Philippines, but as this arises from a territorial dispute and fishing in unregulated areas claimed by Vietnam it is not here included as IUU.) There is also significant under-reporting of tuna in domestic small-scale fisheries within Vietnam׳s own EEZ [89]. The supply of tuna to canneries in Indonesia is almost all local, sourced from IDH inhibitor drugs a variety of vessels, including purse seine, pole and line and artisanal [90]. However, under-reporting of catches from numerous, dispersed landing centers remains a large problem in Indonesia, and catch from artisanal vessels is poorly quantified in national catch statistics [91]. Port sampling by government authorities is sparse, and significant gaps exist in monitoring interactions with protected, vulnerable and threatened species. Significant by-catch and discards of several non-target species occur in Indonesian tuna fisheries, but these are rarely quantified [92] and [93]. Moreover,

tuna catches are not adequately monitored in Indonesian waters, especially for foreign owned fishing selleck chemicals vessels operating under joint-venture agreements [94]. Wild shrimp from the South East Asian region, such as Indonesia, is often purchased at sea and trans-shipped to Thailand and China for processing, and is therefore not landed and reported in source country trade statistics [95]. Part of this catch is unreported but licensed through joint venture agreements with Thai, Taiwanese and Korean vessels. Part of the catch is also from unlicensed vessels selling supplies to trans-shipping vessels at-sea. This extra supply feeds the processing sector in Thailand, while simultaneously diverting the catch away from the Indonesian processing sector. As is seen for other products and regions, the incentive

for IUU fishing is the lack of transparency on trade flows at sea where supplies are amalgamated for large, shore-based processing interests. In Mexico, illegal catches of shrimp may be as high as double the reported catches [96]. In the shrimp trawl fishery, a 2006 estimate by the Mexican navy revealed that nearly 50% of small-scale boats in the province of Sonora were operating illegally; of 8000 boats operating only 4000 were registered [97] and [98]. Illegal practices occur in all of the artisanal shrimp fisheries in the Gulf of California, but the negative interactions are focused in the upper Gulf of California, which includes landings for the ports of San Felipe (Baja California), Puerto Peñasco, and Golfo de Santa Clara, Sonora [99].