To address this, RNA was isolated from the lungs of very sick SCI

To address this, RNA was isolated from the lungs of very sick SCID mice inoculated with DI virus + A/WSN at 16 days post infection. Sequencing confirmed that there were no nucleotide changes compared with the original 244 DI RNA. In addition 5′ and 3′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) confirmed that the terminal sequences were also unchanged (data not shown). The same result was obtained in 2 independent experiments, demonstrating that authentic 244 DI was present in substantial

amounts in the sick mice on day 16 after infection. DI genomes are replicated by the infectious homologous virus and interfere with the production of infectious virus when a critical ratio of DI genomes: infectious genomes

is reached. This suggests that there may Enzalutamide clinical trial be evolutionary pressure for the fixation of viral mutations that result in it no longer this website recognising, replicating or being inhibited by 244 DI RNA. Such resistance has been reported to occur in cell cultures persistently infected by VSV or Sindbis virus [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] and [44] but not in cells infected with influenza viruses. The latter might be considered unlikely as influenza virus resistant to DI virus would have to develop mutations in each of its 8 independently replicating genome segments. To test this possibility we isolated infectious virus from the lungs of severely ill SCID mice at 16 days after inoculation with active DI virus + A/WSN (Fig. 1). Virus was passed once in MDCK cells (to produce SCID/WSN-DI virus), purified as described in Section 2, and titrated in MDCK cells alongside the original A/WSN challenge virus. The SCID/WSN-DI virus (Fig. 4a and b) was then compared ALOX15 with the original A/WSN challenge virus (Fig. 4c and d) at the same infectivity titre (2.8 × 103 ffu) in an in vivo protection experiment with 244 DI virus and immune competent mice. Data in Fig. 4 show that both viruses had similar virulence when inoculated alone or in the presence of inactivated DI virus, and that 1.2 μg of DI virus

gave similar protection to mice infected with SCID/WSN-DI virus or the original A/WSN. A further 10-fold dilution of DI virus gave reduced but still significant protection. This indicates that infectious A/WSN that had been replicating for 16 days in the SCID mice and the original challenge virus recognized 244 DI RNA to a similar extent. Thus the observed breakdown in protection in SCID mice was not due to infectious virus becoming resistant to the DI virus during rounds of multiplication in vivo. Intranasal inoculation with 244 DI influenza virus completely protected SCID mice from rapid onset acute respiratory disease caused by A/WSN over the period that control groups became severely ill and died. Protected mice appeared completely normal showing no sign of disease or weight loss.

Comments are closed.