There are no exact rules; indeed there are valid concerns that exact rules may be inappropriate

and too prescriptive. New procedures evolve, and new methods may be needed to deal with new types of data, just as we know that new ingredients may require modified cooking methods. However, most writers should follow reasonable principles based on current practice, although some flexibility is required, as we shall show in this perspective. Before presenting data, an author should be careful to cover, in the methods section, the actual methods used to carry out the analysis, with the same care and rigour as the other methods used in the research. Just as a PS-341 ic50 knowledgeable scientist should be able to replicate the experiment with the aid of the methods section, a suitably qualified reader should be able to verify the results if given access to the data. In some cases, and probably more often than is the case at present, data analysis may require help from a suitably qualified statistician. Now that requirements for small samples are paramount, statistical

Selleckchem SCH772984 expertise is more and more necessary. A single catch-all phrase of a handful of tests, placed at the end of the methods section, is as unhelpful to the reader as it might be to read a short command at the end of a recipe to ‘chop, slice, boil, sauté, or bake as necessary’. Thus, in the methods section, give relevant details of the statistical methods: 1  Describe how the results were quantified and the data were analysed. This is not trivial. In many biological experiments, the reports are ambiguous. 3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase One is left questioning if the units studied and analysed have been assays, cells, action potentials, offspring, or

litters. The method used for analysis may need to be justified, particularly if it is unusual. Now let us consider presenting the results. The first article in this series stated ‘Show the data, don’t conceal them’ and this suggestion is frequently ignored. The guidelines for The Journal of Physiology currently suggest: Data are often better presented graphically than in tables. Graphs that show individual values are better than solid bars indicating a mean value, unless the number of observations is large, in which case a box and whisker plot can be used.’ We emphasized two important advantages: the emphasis on central tendency is reduced, and the distribution is explicit. Many modern statistical packages can generate ‘dot plots’ and all can generate ‘box and whisker’ plots. It should be possible to understand the figure and caption without recourse to the text. However, we may need to present some data as numbers. These should be given with an appropriate precision, which is often no more than two significant digits. If data are presented as percentages, then the actual values used for the percentage calculation should be given as well.