Other criteria for patient inclusion were age over 18 years, no physiotherapy, no ongoing chiropractic care or rehabilitation for the neck area, ability to provide voluntary written informed consent, willingness to participate in the study as well as follow-up, and ability to perform painful movements of the neck and shoulder. The exclusion criteria included neck pain due to a motor vehicle accident, neck surgery, severe osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis, symptomatic spinal stenosis, surgical interventions of

the cervical spine within the previous 3 months, uncontrolled major depression or psychiatric disorder, acute or uncontrolled medical illness (malignancy or active infection), chronic severe condition that could interfere with interpretation of the outcome assessments, pregnancy or lactation, and engagement BB-94 in experimental medical treatment. Participants with concurrent

headaches, non-radicular pain in the upper extremities, and lower back pain were not excluded if neck pain was their main symptom. The study was approved by the local independent ethics committee, and all patients were informed of the investigational nature of the study. After the patients had read the study information and signed the informed consent form, they were physically examined. The height and weight were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Gender, age, and occupation Necrostatin-1 mw were documented, as well as other clinical characteristics such as the diagnosis, time since first diagnosis, medical history, diagnostic tests performed, duration Thiamet G of therapy, and concomitant treatments. According to a computer-generated random allocation sequence, patients were randomly assigned either to a group treated with a combination of ALA 600 mg and SOD 140 IU once daily in addition to physiotherapy (group 1), or to a group receiving physiotherapy alone (group 2). The ALA/SOD combination therapy was purchased by the patients from a pharmacy. Both groups were treated and followed up for two consecutive

months. Patients were not allowed to take any other analgesic compound for the entire duration of the study. Cervicobrachial pain was assessed by the patients by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a modified Neck Pain Questionnaire (mNPQ). Both the VAS and the mNPQ questionnaire were administered at baseline (T0, pre-treatment), and after 1 month (T1) and 2 months (T2) of treatment. The VAS is a 100 mm line, oriented vertically or horizontally, with one end representing “no pain” and the other end representing “pain as bad as it can be”. The patient is asked to mark a place on the line corresponding to their current pain intensity. The VAS is the most frequently used pain measure because it is simple to use and has good psychometric properties [30].