Of 689 randomized patients receiving treatment (DRV/r: 343; LPV/r: 346), 85 and 114 patients in the DRV/r and LPV/r arms, respectively, had discontinued XL184 concentration by week 192. Noninferiority was shown in the primary endpoint of virological response (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) [DRV/r: 68.8%; LPV/r: 57.2%; P < 0.001; intent to treat (ITT)/time to loss of virological response; estimated difference in response 11.6% (95% confidence interval 4.4–18.8%)]. Statistical superiority in virological response of DRV/r over LPV/r was

demonstrated for the primary endpoint (P = 0.002) and for the ITT non-virological-failure-censored analysis (87.4% vs. 80.8%, respectively; P = 0.040). No protease inhibitor (PI) primary mutations developed and only low levels of nucleoside reverse transcriptase Neratinib inhibitor (NRTI) resistance developed in virological failures in both groups. Significantly fewer discontinuations because of adverse events were observed with DRV/r (4.7%) than with LPV/r (12.7%; P = 0.005). Grade 2–4 treatment-related diarrhoea was significantly less frequent with DRV/r than with LPV/r (5.0% vs. 11.3%,

respectively; P = 0.003). DRV/r was associated with smaller median increases in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than LPV/r. Changes in low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were similar between groups. Similar increases in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase for DRV/r and LPV/r were observed. Over 192 Isotretinoin weeks, once-daily DRV/r was noninferior and statistically superior in virological response to LPV/r, with a more favourable gastrointestinal profile, demonstrating its suitability for long-term use in treatment-naïve patients. Once-daily darunavir (DRV) in combination with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) is now one of the preferred options for first-line therapy for patients in Europe, North America, Australia and other countries [1, 2]. This approval was based on the

findings of the week 48 primary analysis of ARTEMIS (AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In naïve Subjects) which assessed the efficacy and safety of DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily compared with lopinavir/r (LPV/r) 800/200 mg total daily dose (either once or twice daily) in HIV-1-infected adults. In addition, DRV/r has shown favourable efficacy and safety in HIV-1-infected patients with a broad range of treatment experience [3-5]. In the week 48 primary analysis of ARTEMIS, DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily was shown to be noninferior to LPV/r 800/200 mg in virological response [HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL; intent to treat/time to loss of virological response (ITT-TLOVR)] (P < 0.001) [6]. Noninferiority and superiority of DRV/r over LPV/r in virological response were both demonstrated in the 96-week analysis (ITT-TLOVR), thus showing the virological response to DRV/r to be sustained [7].