J Environ Manage 91(1):22–46PubMedCrossRef Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW

J Environ Manage 91(1):22–46PubMedCrossRef Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD (1997) Rapid assessment of plant diversity patterns: a methodology for landscapes.

Environ Monit Assess 48(1):25–43CrossRef Suarez-Seoane S, Osborne PE, Baudry J (2002) Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitat requirements to agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain. Biol Conserv 105(3):333–344CrossRef Ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res 18:271–317CrossRef Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives PLX-4720 cost on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8(8):857–874CrossRef Tshikolovets VV (2003) Butterflies of Eastern Europe, Urals and Caucasus. An illustrated guide. Vadim V Tshikolovets, Kiev Tylianakis JM, Klein A-M, Tscharntke T (2005)

Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of Hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86(12):3296–3302CrossRef Tyre AJ, Tenhumberg B, Field SA, Niejalke D, Parris K, Possingham HP (2003) Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecol Appl FDA-approved Drug Library price 13(6):1790–1801CrossRef Vellend M, Lilley PL, Starzomski BM (2008) Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys. J Appl Ecol 45(1):161–169CrossRef Verhulst J, Baldi A, Kleijn D (2004) Relationship between land-use intensity and species richness and abundance of birds in Hungary. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(3):465–473CrossRef Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30(2):279–338CrossRef Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 16(8):446–453CrossRef Zipkin EF, Dewan A,

Royle JA (2009) Impacts of forest fragmentation on species richness: a hierarchical approach to community modelling. J Appl Ecol 46(4):815–822CrossRef”
“Introduction Anthropogenic ponds, formed in pits made by the excavation of mineral resources, have become a crucial component of the hydrographic network (Pakulnicka 2008). Their role is increasingly important as the degradation of the aquatic environment progresses due to water contamination, eutrophication and, above all, a lower level of groundwater, which is responsible for the pentoxifylline disappearance of many small water bodies, particularly kettle lakes. Anthropogenic ponds turn into habitats settled by communities of invertebrates, which are extremely rich and diverse with respect to species and synecology (Barnes 1983; Donath 1980; Stöckel 1983; Kognitzki 1988; Ohnesorge 1988; Spitzenberg 1988; Ott 1995; Carl 1997; Sternberg 1997; Trockur 1997; Weihrauch 1998; Xylander 1999; Buczyński 1999; Buczyński and Pakulnicka 2000; Wimmer and Sprick 2000; Kowalik and Buczyński 2003; Lewin and Smoliński 2006; Pakulnicka 2008; Lenda et al. 2012).

Comments are closed.