In accordance with a recent study ( Stiborova

et al., 2014b) we suggest that adduct spot B2 is a guanine adduct derived from reaction with 9-hydroxy-BaP-4,5-epoxide. Using CYP1A1 reconstituted systems it was recently shown that the formation of dG-N2-BPDE (adduct B1) depended on the presence of epoxide hydrolase while adduct B2 was solely http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Dasatinib.html formed when CYP1A1 and NADPH:cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR) only were present ( Stiborova et al., 2014b). In MEFs two additional BaP-derived DNA adduct spots were detectable that were not structurally identified. No such adduct spots were detected in control (untreated) cells (data not shown). In ES cells BaP induced up to 126 ± 31 adducts per 108 nucleotides at 10 μM after 48 h, with adduct levels being ∼3-fold lower after 24 h ( Fig. 3A). BaP–DNA adduct levels in MEFs were manifoldly Rapamycin concentration higher ( Fig. 3B). The highest DNA adduct level in MEFs was observed at 2 μM after 48 h of BaP exposure (4583 ± 392 adducts per 108 nucleotides), which was 44 times higher than in ES cells under the same experimental conditions. In a recent study using primary HUFs treated with 1 μM BaP for 48 h, levels of 175 ± 62 adducts per 108 nucleotides were detected ( Kucab et al., 2012), indicating that the response of MEFs to BaP can differ. However, it may also be difficult to try to directly compare these findings as strain

differences (C57Bl/6 versus 129/Sv) and the p53 phenotype (Hupki versus Trp53) might have influenced the results between studies. Because cellular levels of p53 protein increase via post-transcriptional mechanisms upon genotoxic stress (Hockley et al., 2008), we measured protein expression of p53 and its downstream target p21 (Fig. 4). p53 and p21 expression was not altered in ES cells after BaP exposure (Fig. 4A), however, a clear increase in p53 expression was observed in BaP-treated MEFs while p21 remained unchanged (Fig.

4B). These results were in line with the results obtained by 32P-postlabelling analysis. ES cells have been shown to contain a higher amount of p53 than differentiated cells (Solozobova and Blattner, 2010) and regulation of p53 is known to differ in ES cells and differentiated cells, thus the p53 response to DNA damage enough in these cell types may also be different (Liu et al., 2014 and Solozobova et al., 2009). In order to determine whether the differences in BaP-induced DNA adduct levels observed between ES cells and MEFs could be due to differences in their metabolic competence, the expression of XMEs involved in BaP metabolism was evaluated. We therefore analysed Cyp1a1 and Nqo1 mRNA expression by RT-PCR. In BaP-treated ES cells expression of Cyp1a1 was up-regulated ∼40-fold ( Fig. 5A) independent of the BaP concentration used, which was in line with the observed BaP-induced DNA adduct levels. In MEFs BaP exposure resulted in a massive induction of Cyp1a1 expression ( Fig.