www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD8931.html However, even with such a high uncertainty, none of the models can predict the plaque productivity selleckchem within the entire range of lysis time used in our study. This is especially true when the lysis time is ~39 min. Discussion The appearance of a plaque is the oldest, but also the most useful and direct way of confirming the presence of a phage. Even with
the advent of modern technologies, such as real-time quantitative PCR and fluorescence-labeling, the simplicity of plaque counting is still the easiest and the most commonly used method for quantifying the number of infectious phages in a sample [28, 29]. Even in the earliest days, researchers have been divining the various idiosyncratic traits of a phage through the size and shape of the plaque it makes [30]. Except for plaques made by phages like T7, most plaques have a definitive size after overnight incubation. One of the most important changes during this typical incubation
period is the switch of host physiology from the initial exponential growth to the eventual stationary stagnation. With few exceptions [3, 4, 31], most phages cannot sustain productive infections when infecting stationary phase cells. Consequently, the plaque size would be limited by the amount of time available for productive infections. The length of productive time can be manipulated by either the initial host density learn more or host physiology (e.g., growth rate). For example, in the case of phage ϕ6, the phage made a larger plaque when plated with a lower initial host density [19, 32].
In the most extreme case, addition of sub-lethal amount of antibiotics and/or glycerol in the agar plate, presumably changing the host physiology, greatly improved the appearance of the plaque, Thalidomide transforming it from small and turbid to large and clear [33]. In our study, however, all the plating conditions were kept constant (except when determining the impact of phage morphology on plaque size, in which we used different host strains), therefore, the differences in plaque size and productivity would simply be due to the differences in phage traits, rather than the amount of time available for productive infection. The life cycle of a phage in an agar plate can be divided into two parts: the extracellular phase for virion diffusion/adsorption and the intracellular phase for progeny production. All else being equal, more time for the extracellular phase would allow the virion to diffuse farther. On the other hand, more time for the intracellular phase would produce more progeny that could be diffused. From this point-of-view, it can be argued that the problems of plaque size and plaque productivity can be seen as a problem of how to optimally allocate the limited time between the extra- and intra-cellular phases. It is possible that the optimal time allocation for maximum plaque size may not be the same for maximum plaque productivity [22].