Differential item functioning (DIF) was used to assess whether HADS responses drawn from the two samples were equivalent. Common-item equating was used to anchor the shared (HADS) items, whilst the PANAS items were added. Item fit was evaluated at each stage, and misfitting items were removed. Unidimensionality was assessed with a principal components factor analysis. Results The DIF analysis did not reveal any differences between the HADS item locations from the two samples. Three misfitting PANAS items were

Oligomycin A removed, resulting in a final unidimensional bank of 80 items with good internal reliability (=0.85). Conclusion The new item bank is valid for use across the cancer journey, including cancer survivors, and modestly improves the assessment of all levels of psychological distress and positive psychological function. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“Organ shortage has driven many transplant centers to extend their criteria for organ Selleckchem Taselisib acceptance. Graft allocation policies have been modified accordingly. This report focuses on the impact of applying the so-called rescue allocation (RA) strategy for liver transplantation (LT) in a single center within the Eurotransplant (ET) area. Liver grafts Lire considered for

RA when the regular organ allocation is declined by at least three centers or is averted because of donor instability/unfavorable logistical reasons, thus entering a competitive or a single-recipient rescue organ offer procedure. respectively. The accepting center has the advantage to select a recipient from its own waiting list for these RA grafts. Among 253 livers accepted at the University of Heidelberg, between January 2004

and December 2006, we transplanted 85 (34%) rescue-allocated livers. The indications for LT AZD3965 mouse were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 43%), chronic fiver disease (55%), and acute liver failure (2%). Median cold ischemia time for RA grafts was 10 h (range: 4-17). The MELD score (mean +/- SD) was 13 +/- 7 (range: 6-40) and was 12 +/- 7 for recipients with HCC. Three (3.5%) primary non-functions (PNF) Occurred after transplantation of RA livers. One-year patient and graft survival were 84% and 75 %, respectively. A comparison between the recipients of RA livers and regularly allocated livers revealed no significant difference regarding initial poor function (IPF). PNF, and surgical complications. Furthermore. it median follow-up of 16 months’ revealed no significant difference regarding patient and graft survival between the two groups. The use of RA organs has increased the donor pool and transplantation dynamics with satisfying results.