Although the incidence of MRSA infections may be declining, HIV-infected persons continue to experience significantly higher rates
compared with the general population and appear to have an increased susceptibility for recurrence. The reasons for the elevated rates are multifactorial, but probably related to lifestyle behaviours (e.g. high-risk sexual activities and drug use), underlying immune dysfunction, and higher rates of antibiotic Everolimus purchase use and hospitalizations. The precise relationship between HIV infection and MRSA infection has yet to be fully elucidated, and further research is needed, especially in the area of optimal treatment and preventive strategies. In the meantime, reduction of risk factors, including immunosuppression and high-risk sexual
behaviours, should be considered. The authors have no financial interest in this work. All authors contributed to the content of the manuscript and concurred with the decision to submit it for publication. The content and views expressed in this publication are GSK1120212 cell line the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This work is original and has not been published elsewhere. “
“The aim of the study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) over 96 weeks in patients receiving no treatment or 24 or 60 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)
during primary HIV-1 infection (PHI). A multicentre prospective cohort study of PHI patients, with an embedded randomized trial, was carried out. HRQL was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Thymidine kinase Study Health Survey for HIV (MOS-HIV) and a symptom checklist administered at weeks 0, 8, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96. Mixed linear models were used for the analysis of differences in HRQL among the three groups. A total of 112 patients were included in the study: 28 received no treatment, 45 received 24 weeks of cART and 39 received 60 weeks of cART. Over 96 weeks of follow-up, the groups receiving 24 and 60 weeks of cART had better cognitive functioning than the no-treatment group (P = 0.005). Patients receiving 60 weeks of cART had less pain (P = 0.004), better role functioning (P = 0.001), better physical functioning (P = 0.02) and a better physical health summary score (P = 0.006) than the groups receiving no treatment or 24 weeks of cART. Mental health was better in patients receiving 24 weeks of cART than in patients in the no-treatment group or the group receiving 60 weeks of cART (P = 0.02). At week 8, patients in the groups receiving 24 and 60 weeks of cART reported more nausea (P = 0.