7 mg/kg, respectively.

Some readers may argue that these high doses of oral midazolam are candidates for deep sedation which, although not reported in the studies, may have been measurable if equipments such as bispectral index monitors were to be used to verify the depth of sedation. Minor side effects were much more common and seen in 14% of all RCT studies with nausea/vomiting, transient desaturations and paradoxical reactions being the chief complaints. Further analysis of the relationship between oral midazolam dosage and prevalence of symptoms was felt to be unwise due Selleckchem Enzalutamide to the generally poor quality of the data. The frequency of transient desaturations emphasises the importance of adequate monitoring during sedation. Of the six studies reporting a transient desaturation, two did not provide a figure for the lowest oxygen saturation level reached[14, 39], whereas the remaining four studies reported that oxygen saturation reached low levels ranging from 78% to 94%[17, 23, 25, 36]. The importance of safety in sedation is paramount and the authors advise the use of pulse oximetry

and the availability of emergency equipment as standard. What constitutes a significant side effect? An arbitrary description was made for this review which some readers may disagree with; however, given the data available, we felt it was the best compromise. Clearly, an inability to maintain an airway or persistent desaturation should be considered as significant but what about transient desaturations? We felt that if these were easily

correctable through head repositioning, Dorsomorphin solubility dmso then they should be considered as minor, and this sort of transient desaturation could be due to a range of reasons including breath holding or crying. It is important to recognise that all the side effects recorded here were very ‘clinician-centred’, Calpain that is, they could be considered as anything that might interfere with provision of the treatment. It might be interesting as part of any future work to look at patient-centred measures and perhaps get patients’ views as to what events they would consider to be significant. In general, it would be helpful if more generally agreed descriptions of side effects existed that could be used in future studies, thus facilitating greater comparison between studies and between different methods of sedation. In conclusion, significant or major side effects associated with oral midazolam usage for behaviour management in children and adolescents requiring dental treatment appear to be rare. Minor events are more common but determining precise figures was complicated by poor reporting. Why this paper is important to paediatric dentists? There is currently little information available as to the safety of midazolam when used as an oral sedative in children needing dental treatment. This study revealed that significant side effects are uncommon.