7 HD 20 + 16 2 158.1 Blood pressure MRT67307 measurement Each patient visited approximately at the same time (from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.). Office blood pressure measurement was evaluated with an automated digital brachial artery blood pressure

device (HEM-907, Omron, Japan) with patients in a sitting position. Blood pressures were measured three https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Ispinesib-mesilate(SB-715992).html times and averaged for the evaluation before and at least 1 month after the switch. Questionnaire survey A patient questionnaire survey was conducted after switch to the combination drugs. The questionnaire consisted of four items: increase or decrease in the frequency of missed doses, increase or decrease in the drug costs, changes in home blood pressure, and satisfaction of the combination drugs. Statistical analysis Numerical data are presented as mean ± SD. Comparison between two groups was done by t test or paired t test as appropriate. Comparison among three groups was performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD as post hoc analysis. For correlation analysis, Pearson’s or Spearman’s rho was utilized as appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS for Windows version 22 (IBM, Japan). P values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Results Patients The antihypertensive medications of total 90 patients (58 men and 32 women; mean age 63.1 ± 13.4 years) were switched to combination of antihypertensive drugs containing

ARB and CCB between December 2010 and February 2012. The baseline characteristics of the patients FK228 are shown in Table 2. SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 142.7 ± 19.4 and 82.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, respectively, the values still above the target. The patients took 2.18 ± 0.59 types of antihypertensive drugs, and the mean potency was calculated as 2.22 ± 0.74. The components of the hypertensive drugs were ARB + CCB (n = 58, 64.4 %), ARB + CCB + diuretic agent (n = 11,

12.2 %), monotherapy using CCB (n = 9, 10.0 %), monotherapy using ARB (n = 4, 4.4 %), ARB + CCB + alpha-blocker + diuretic agent (n = 3, 3.3 %), ACE inhibitor + CCB PAK5 (n = 2, 2.2 %), and others (n = 3, 3.3 %) (Table 2). Table 2 Demographic data Age (years) 63.1 ± 13.4 Sex Male 58 (64.4 %) Female 32 (35.6 %) CKD, No. (%) 42 (46.7 %) SBP (mmHg) 142.7 ± 19.4 mmHg DBP (mmHg) 82.6 ± 13.0 mmHg Current antihypertensive medication, no. (%)  ARB + CCB 58 (64.4 %)  ARB + CCB + diuretics 11 (12.2 %)  CCB 9 (10.0 %)  ARB 4 (4.4 %)  ARB + CCB + α-blocker + diuretics 3 (3.3 %)  ACEi + CCB 2 (2.2 %)  ARB + ACEi + CCB 1 (1.1 %)  ARB + CCB + α-blocker 1 (1.1 %)  CCB + diuretics 1 (1.1 %) Months after the switch to combination drugs    4.2 ± 2.8 months Forty-two patients (46.7 %) had CKD defined by the presence of proteinuria or an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated from an equation for the estimation of GFR in Japanese subjects [11]. Changes in potency, number of tablets and drug costs Changes in antihypertensive potency before and after the switch were examined.