0-GHz irradiated cells and with antibiotics used were observed (P < 0.015 and P < 0.01 for ceftriaxone and kanamycin, respectively). However, compared with irradiated cells, the antibiotics used had no marked effects on DCCD-sensitive ATPase activity (Fig. 3b). This is associated with the F0F1 activity reported by Trchounian & Kobayashi (1998). These data regarding the combined effects of EMI and antibiotics on F0F1-ATPase activity with membrane vesicles seem to be different

from those for H+ transport activity obtained with whole cells (compare Figs 2 and 3). It is possible that antibiotics affected cells differently from FOF1. They might therefore have mediated effects on this ATPase. Alternatively, the decreased ATPase activity values were so low and almost residual that the effects of different antibiotics could not be seen. The results obtained indicate that the action Crizotinib nmr of low-intensity extremely high-frequency EMI in combination with different antibiotics – ceftriaxone and kanamycin – enhances the EMI antibacterial effects. This is clearly observed in the longer duration of En. hirae lag phase growth and increased inhibition of specific growth rate. These effects might be due to changes in membrane properties such as of H+ and K+ transport caused by EMI and enhanced by antibiotics. These

changes disturb membrane proteins forming H+ secretion pathways and of F0F1, leading to effects on the structure and activity of other membrane proteins. Namely, KtrI activity is affected via changes in F0F1 or in the system itself. However, in both cases an interaction between these transport and enzyme systems learn more of the bacterial membrane might be destroyed. As

the interaction might be implemented through dithiol–disulfide transitions (Trchounian, 2004; Poladyan & Glycogen branching enzyme Trchounian, 2006), it is possible to suggest destruction of intra- or intermolecular bridges between membrane proteins. The molecular structure of proteins forming KtrI is not yet clear (Trchounian & Kobayashi, 1998; Trchounian, 2004), and its interaction mechanisms with F0F1 are not established (Trchounian & Kobayashi, 1998; Trchounian, 2004; Poladyan & Trchounian, 2006; Vardanyan & Trchounian, 2010), but our data may be useful in revealing the mechanisms of operation of KtrI and F0F1. In all cases, the membrane property changes by EMI suggest membranotrophic mechanisms in the antibacterial effects of this factor. Moreover, changes in these membrane proteins, in turn, might enhance the antibacterial effects of antibiotics used even if they act differently in cells (Kohanski et al., 2007; Tadevosyan et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2009; Torgomyan et al., 2011a). However, different effects with ceftriaxone and kanamycin may be of particular interest. Despite differences, the combined effects of extremely high-frequency EMI and antibiotics on En. hirae are similar to those with E. coli (Tadevosyan et al.