2.4.2). There were no interactions between Stem Cell Compound Library solubility dmso Prime condition and Event codability, so this analysis is not reported. Three time windows were chosen for examination in each analysis based on three theoretically important distinctions. The first time window included the period between 0 ms (picture onset) and 400 ms (i.e., two consecutive bins of 200 ms each): on Griffin and Bock’s (2000) account, speakers may select a starting point in this time window on the basis of their construal of the gist of the event (hierarchical incrementality), or, on Gleitman et al.’s (2007) account, on the basis of non-relational properties of the two characters

(linear incrementality).6 It was expected that formulation would be more hierarchically incremental in high-codability events and more linearly incremental in events with high-codability agents. Priming character names in this experiment was also expected to result in a shift towards linear incrementality. The second and third time windows included the period between 400 ms and speech onset that corresponds to retrieval of the first character name (name-related gazes). This time window includes a segment with increasing fixations (400–1000 ms, i.e., three 200 ms time bins) and decreasing fixations

to this character (1000–1800 ms in Experiment 1, and thus four 200 ms time bins; 1000–2200 ms in Experiment Doxorubicin in vitro 2, and thus six 200 ms time bins). The length of gazes on the agent and thus the timing of gaze shifts from the agent to the patient were expected to reflect the ease

of encoding HA-1077 mw the agent and to show when speakers were ready to begin adding the patient to the sentence. The models included all predictors as additive factors and only interactions that contributed to model fit (p < .10) and that were reliable at pMCMC < .05 (for models without random slopes) or p < .05 (for models with random slopes), unless stated otherwise. The by-item analyses had less statistical power, so interactions in these analyses that were reliable but did not improve model fit (relative to models without these interactions) are reported for comparison with the by-participant analyses. Main effects of a variable in these models indicate differences in fixations at the start of a given window (i.e., the first time bin in a given window), and interactions with the Time variable (Time bin) indicate changes in the slopes of fixations over time (i.e., changes between the first time bin and subsequent time bins in a given window). Fixations between 0 and 400 ms. Fig. 3a and b shows the timecourse of formulation for descriptions of “easy” and “hard” events with “easy” and “hard” agents. Overall, speakers quickly directed their attention to the agent between 0 and 200 ms of picture onset and then briefly looked back to the patient by 400 ms.