Figure 3 XPS narrow scans of Sn 3 d 5/2 core-level In-Sn-O nanostructures. (a) Sample 1, (b) sample 2, and (c) sample 3. Figure 4 XPS narrow scans of In 3 d core-level doublet of In-Sn-O nanostructures. (a) Sample 1, (b) sample 2, and (c) sample 3. Figure 5 XPS narrow scans of O 1  s core level of In-Sn-O nanostructures. (a) Sample 1, (b) sample 2, and (c) sample 3. Figure 6a shows a low-magnification TEM image of sample 1, which exhibits several nanostructures. Each individual

nanostructure was capped with CB-839 a clear spherical particle. EDX analyses of the particle and stem showed that this particle was composed mainly of Sn (69.4 at.%) and considerably small amounts of In (2.5 at.%) and O (28.1 at.%). Moreover, the stem of the nanostructure consisted mainly of In (44.4 at.%) and O (53.6 at.%) and a small amount of Sn (2.0 at.%). The analyses of the composition revealed that the O content of the stem was below the stoichiometric value of In2O3, which is consistent with the XPS O 1 s analysis. The presence of Sn-rich particles at the ends of the nanostructures indicated that the vapor–liquid-solid (VLS) process might be

crucial for crystal growth. Several studies on the synthesis of In2O3 nanostructures have shown the importance of the Au catalytic layer for the formation of In2O3 nanostructures [23]. Most of the catalytic growth of oxide nanostructures through vapor transport follows a VLS crystal growth process [24]. In this work, no metallic thin layer was pre-deposited onto the substrates to act as a catalyst for nanostructure growth. Recently, a self-catalyst VLS growth mechanism buy PF-562271 was proposed to explain the growth of Mg-doped ZnO nanostructures

and Zn-Sn-O nanowires [25, 26]. The origin of the metallic Sn particles at the ends of our nanostructures might thus be similar to those of previously reported nanostructures. The selected TEM image taken from the corner of the particle-stem TCL region of Figure 6b reveals a non-zero www.selleckchem.com/products/nu7026.html conical angle, demonstrating that the nanostructure geometry ended at a decreasing radius during growth (inset 1 in Figure 6b). The HRTEM image in Figure 6b shows clear lattice fringes corresponding to the (200) plane, which is perpendicular to the stem axis, of the cubic In2O3 structure. The sharp and bright spots in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern taken along the [001] zone axis show that the nanostructure was single crystalline and grew along the [100] axis (inset 3). Moreover, the SAED pattern of the particle could be indexed along the [010] zone axis of Sn (inset 4). The HRTEM image taken from the interface of particle and stem reveals a thin transition layer with a thickness of approximately 5 nm at the interface (inset 5). Below this transition layer, ordered lattice fringes of (200) for In2O3 were observed over the entire stem.