Antral biopsy should be avoided, especially in serologically atrophic patients. “
“Helicobacter pylori infection is acquired mainly during childhood. To eradicate H. pylori, clarithromycin-based triple therapy has been recommended in children and adults by the latest Maastricht Consensus. However, the prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori was higher in children

than that in adults. Therefore, rapid, reliable and noninvasive methods for detecting clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains should be developed for children. Studies on evaluating stool PCR in detecting clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori and epidemiological surveys of the prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori in children were searched in PubMed (from 1966 to December, 2011) for reviewing. The average rates of primary clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori ranged from less than https://www.selleckchem.com/products/VX-809.html 10% to more than www.selleckchem.com/products/ensartinib-x-396.html 40% in different regions. The rates of secondary resistance to clarithromycin were higher than primary resistance in the same population. In H. pylori isolated from children, the frequent point mutations that are responsible for the clarithromycin resistance included A2143G, A2142G, A2142C and A2144G, and they varied geographically. Comparing with culture-based susceptibility tests, stool PCR performed excellently for their rapidity, independence of bacterial growth, reproducibility

and easy standardization. However, stool PCR showed lower sensitivity but perfect specificity in detection of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori in children. Methodology and mixed infections of resistant H. pylori strains might contribute to the considerable discrepancies of stool PCR results. Detection of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori by stool PCR for children are reliable, rapid, noninvasive methods that are worthy of further clinical

promotion. However, more evaluations of stool PCR in detection of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori in children need to be conducted. “
“An ideal second-line therapeutic regimen for the treatment of patients who do not respond to standard triple therapy is currently being investigated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of two levofloxacin-containing second-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). One hundred and forty eight consecutive H. pylori Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase -positive patients who did not respond to the standard triple therapy (77 female, 71 male) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized consecutively to two-second-line therapy groups; 73 to the levofloxacin-containing sequential (LCS) and 75 to the levofloxacin-containing quadruple (LCQ) therapy group. The LCS therapy group received pantoprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1,000 mg twice daily for 5 days followed by pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily and metronidazole 500 mg three times daily and levofloxacin 500 mg one time daily for 7 days.