The present-day median value is 9,571. For the restricted http://www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD1152-HQPA.html lineage, the Bayesian skyline plot (Fig. 4b) suggests that there has been little change in population size. However, several runs, totaling hundreds of millions of generations, had to be combined to bring the ESS for some parameters close to the recommended minimum value of 100 for this lineage. This suggests that the data are inadequate to recover a strong signal for this lineage. When the tMRCA for the two Australian lineages was set to 115 kya, a mutation

rate of around 25% per million years (95% HPD ~14%–37% per million years) was inferred. All analyses indicate that there is genetic structure within each lineage. Values for FCT and, consequently, of FST, calculated using AMOVA, were always significant (Table 1), indicating DAPT datasheet that there is significant differentiation among regions and among populations across regions. Values for FSC were never significant, implying little differentiation between populations within a given region. However, the number of samples varied substantially across populations and many populations were small, limiting statistical power. Population pairwise FST values for each lineage are shown in Table S2, S3. Many pairs of populations are significantly differentiated, but rarely those within any regional grouping used in the AMOVA analyses. The spatial sampling of individual haplotypes,

especially in the widespread lineage, must have had a strong influence on this analysis. For example, all three haplotypes present in Blue Mud Bay were also found in Shoalwater Bay (over 4,000 km away along the coast), which explains the apparent lack of differentiation between these localities (Table S2). Other examples of widely distributed haplotypes can be found in Table S1. It is striking that representatives of the restricted lineage in Torres Strait (including one representative from Blue Mud Bay in the Northern Territory) form a population MCE公司 strongly differentiated from dugongs of the same lineage in southern and central Queensland (Table S3). The

Mantel tests comparing pairwise population genetic distances with geographical distances (Fig. S1) suggested a degree of isolation by distance, but none was significantly different from null expectations regardless of the approach used to estimate geographical distances. When Mantel tests were done using individuals rather than populations and a genetic distance matrix based on pairwise numbers of differences between sequences, significant isolation by distance was implied for each lineage (P ≤ 0.001 in each case) (Fig. S1). Australian dugongs, with the exception of two individuals from Ashmore Reef, fell into two distinct maternal lineages. The widespread lineage occurs throughout the dugong’s Australian distribution but is rare in Moreton Bay.