When evaluating these trees as representations of the phylogeneti

When evaluating these trees as representations of the phylogenetic information contained in the respective sequence alignments for each of the aforesaid markers (Table S4), 286 topologies were

consistently rejected with respect to each of the four markers and two further trees (#199 and #210, see Table S3) were rejected by all markers but ftsY. This generally high percentage of rejection demonstrates that the sequence alignments contain sufficient phylogeny-relevant information to generate meaningful 1sKH test results. In contrast to this rather uniform rejection of 288/297 candidate trees, the 1sKH test outcome for the remaining nine topologies represented in Fig. 5 is highly differential with respect to the different markers investigated (Tables 1 and S4). This subset of candidate topologies contains all marker-specific http://www.selleckchem.com/products/bay80-6946.html best trees this website and represents the permutative possibilities of combining a specific internal structure of the Rickettsiella clade (three possibilities) with different phylogenetic relationships between the three genera of Legionellales (three possibilities, see Fig. 5). In particular, topologies #45, #144, and #243 represent an internal Rickettsiella clade structure coincident with both

the currently accepted taxonomy and the above-mentioned phylogenetic reconstruction (Figs 1-4). Importantly, the topologies designated by the 1sKH test as marker-specific best trees, i.e. topologies #45 and #144, display this specific Rickettsiella clade structure (Table 1). Moreover, with respect to this subset of nine candidate topologies, the 1sKH test generates unequally

discriminative results for different markers. Whereas the eight topologies from this subset representing less likely interpretations of the 23S ribosomal RNA gene alignment than the marker-specific best tree (#45) are not rejected by the 1sKH test, the same trees are found significantly worse, i.e. rejected, representations of the concatenated MLST marker sequence data in comparison with the same most likely tree (Table 1). Evaluation of the 16S rRNA and ftsY markers gives rise Thalidomide to intermediately discriminative outcomes. For both protein-encoding markers, 1sKH results are at this level identical irrespective if based on deduced amino acid or filtered nucleotide sequence data (Table 1). Consequently, whereas all sequence data sets considered appear perfectly suitable markers with respect to the generic classification of Rickettsiella bacteria, only the concatenated MLST markers provide sufficient aggregated information to generate a significant infra-generic assignment as evaluated by the 1sKH test.

Comments are closed.