We propose a greatly simplified algorithm for constructing an example version of the optimum fairway leading to Vyborg (Figure 3). The beginning of the fairway near Vyborg is selected manually at the closest sea point to the port where the probability is ≤ 0.9 or the age ≥ 1 day. The next fairway point is sought among the five adjacent points located in the major direction of the ship’s route to the west as in Figure 10 as a point in which the minimal probability (or the maximal age of particles) of these five points occurs. The process is repeated until the westward-sailing ship reaches the Baltic Proper. Note that the process is not symmetrical with

respect to change in sailing direction and generally fails to establish the optimum fairway for ships sailing I-BET-762 supplier eastwards to the ports in the gulf. In essence, this procedure is a discrete variation of the method of the least steep gradient for finding crests or troughs on a 2D map of elevations. For the case where the relevant fields have exactly one minimum across the gulf, the method obviously finds this minimum and follows it. As the general appearance of the distributions HTS assay for the probabilities and particle age are fairly similar and

the relevant maxima and minima match each other well, it is not surprising that the resulting optimum fairways (not shown) are located quite close to each other for each resolution. They almost overlap in the relatively narrow part of the gulf between Naissaar and Porkkala and in the narrow passages between the islands, for example, to the south of Gogland at different resolutions (Soomere et al. 2011a,b). Neither is it unexpected that they deviate up to 20 km from each other in the widest sections of the gulf where the relevant gradients

in the underlying fields are small (Soomere et al. 2010) Clomifene and where even small levels of noise may relocate the extremes by a considerable distance. Surprisingly, the two optima may also deviate considerably in the narrow area between Tallinn and Helsinki that hosts extremely heavy cargo and passenger ferry traffic. The optimum fairways calculated using different resolutions show much more complicated patterns of mutual behaviour. For example, according to the spatial distributions of the probability for coastal hits, the fairways to Vyborg visit completely different areas of the Gulf of Finland (Figure 11). While the differences between the fairways at the 1 nm and 0.5 nm resolutions are moderate, the fairway for the 2 nm model reflects a completely different pattern of underlying dynamics, especially in the eastern Gulf of Finland. This example vividly illustrates the importance of the impact of the particular horizontal resolution on the resulting location of the optimum fairway.